Climate's changed before | |
It's the sun | |
It's not bad | |
There is no consensus | |
It's cooling | |
Models are unreliable | |
Temp record is unreliable | |
Animals and plants can adapt | |
It hasn't warmed since 1998 | |
Antarctica is gaining ice | |
View All Arguments... |
Latest Posts
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #17 2024
- Water is at the heart of farmers’ struggle to survive in Benin
- At a glance - The difference between weather and climate
- India makes a big bet on electric buses
- EGU2024 - An intense week of joining sessions virtually
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #16 2024
- How extreme was the Earth's temperature in 2023
- At a glance - Is the science settled?
- What is Mexico doing about climate change?
- Fact Brief - Did global warming stop in 1998?
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #15 2024
- EGU2024 - Picking and chosing sessions to attend virtually
- At a glance - The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is not causing global warming
- Climate Adam: Is Global Warming Speeding Up?
- Gigafact and Skeptical Science collaborate to create fact briefs
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #14 2024
- How can I make my retirement plan climate-friendly?
- At a glance - Global warming and the El Niño Southern Oscillation
- A data scientist’s case for ‘cautious optimism’ about climate change
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #13 2024
- You can start applying for the American Climate Corps next month
- At a glance - Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
- Want clean electricity? These are the overlooked elected officials who get to decide.
- Climate - the Movie: a hot mess of (c)old myths!
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #12 2024
Archives
Posted on 23 April 2024 by John Mason, BaerbelW
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a "bump" for our ask. This week features "The difference between weather and climate". More will follow in the upcoming weeks. Please follow the Further Reading link at the bottom to read the full rebuttal and to join the discussion in the comment thread there.
At a glance
How do you go about weather forecasting by yourself? Study the computer models. With experience, you will become familiar with the art - for it takes human interpretation of model output to make the calls. That's what weathermen do.
Forecast model output is freely available online and covers many parameters - pressure, temperature, rainfall and a myriad of others. Different models extend to different end-times - the Global Forecasting System (GFS) extends to T+ 384 hours or 16 days, for example. Pressure, or synoptic charts as they are known, portray the positions and subsequent developments of high and low pressure systems over large swathes of the planet.
Models are run several times a day. If you examine synoptic charts for the same run of several different models, you will see they all look very similar to start with. But if you then follow them through successive time-points - T+24, 48, 72 hours and so on, there will come a point where you start to notice slight and then larger differences between them. This divergence is where confidence in forecasting falls right away.
Forecasting - interpreting the GFS and other model output - is about working with uncertainty in the highly dynamic and to an extent chaotic medium that is our atmosphere. But with experience, you can do your own short term forecasting too, at least for the coming 3-5 days.
Longer-term weather forecasting a week or more in advance is about stating probabilities, not saying what will happen. Very different things. Serious amateur forecasters stick to the shorter, next few days bracket, if they want to avoid egg on their faces. There are a few out there who often make wild claims that usually fail to be borne out by reality. Unfortunately, sections of the more populist media happily quote them. It generates click-baity headlines.
Now, what about climate? Climate differs from weather because it includes certain highly deterministic drivers. Deterministic means they evolve independently of weather but can change the physical conditions on Earth from state A to state B. Cyclic variations in Earth's orbit of the Sun, operating over tens of thousands of years, are a good example. They may only drive average planetary temperature changes of a few degrees Celsius, upwards or downwards. But with the help of climate feedbacks, that is enough to have caused past ice-ages - and to have gotten us out of them again.
Changes in the strength of Earth's greenhouse effect are likewise deterministic, but to a far greater extent. They have forced past transitions from the Hothouse to the Icehouse climate state. Hothouse, by the way, is an ice-free Earth. Because we know how the greenhouse effect works, we can say with confidence that intensifying its strength will cause global temperatures to rise over centuries. What we cannot say is what weather will occur on a certain day at a certain place, decades from now. But there's a handy saying to cover that: "climate trains the boxer, but the weather throws the punches". (Deke Arndt, Climate Monitoring Branch Chief, NCDC, 2010)
Please usethis form to provide feedback about this new "At a glance" section. Read a more technical version below or dig deeper via the tabs above!
Click for Further details
In case you'd like to explore more of our recently updated rebuttals, here are the links to all of them:
If you think that projects like these rebuttal updates are a good idea, please visit our support page to contribute!
0 0
Printable Version | Link to this page
Comments
There have been no comments posted yet.
You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.
THE ESCALATOR
(free to republish)